Explained by authorization
noulDoes a valid, matching authorization or maintenance record explain the observed activity?
Jev example · Security triage
Combine several signals instead of one isolated warning.
This is the context Jev receives before answering the typed question.
{
"alert": "New rule forwards all finance email externally",
"actor": {
"new_device": true,
"mfa_bypassed": true
},
"rule": {
"destination": "external@example.invalid"
},
"approved_request": null
}Does a valid, matching authorization or maintenance record explain the observed activity?
Select a review route from available evidence. Do not execute any containment.
How strong is the evidence of unauthorized activity?
Add a matching, verified migration request.
Catalog source: TypeSafeAI/typesafe-playground, reused under MIT. This is an independent community catalog, not an official TypeSafe AI product.
Background source: Inspired by TypeSafe workflow evals; examples authored for this playground