Jev example · Invoices & expenses

A meal receipt with no context

Assess missing business purpose and approval.

Workflows & decisionschoicenoulscore

State

This is the context Jev receives before answering the typed question.

{
  "expense": {
    "category": "meal",
    "total": 118,
    "description": "Dinner"
  },
  "receipt": {
    "readable": true,
    "items": "Food and drinks"
  },
  "policy": "Meals over $75 require a stated business purpose and manager approval.",
  "business_purpose": null,
  "approval": null
}

Typed questions (3)

Review route

choice

Which review route fits the provided records? Arithmetic, actual payment and account changes are outside this test.

Try in Playground

ready | Supporting evidence is complete with no unresolved issue
documents | Required delivery or approval evidence is missing
correction | Invoice details require a corrected document
duplicate | Records show this invoice was already paid
verify_vendor | An unverified vendor or payment-detail change needs review
dispute | An unresolved billed item conflicts with supplied evidence

Charges supported

noul

Does the evidence support all billed items and quantities?

Try in Playground

Uncertainty

score

How much material ambiguity remains in the supplied invoice evidence?

Try in Playground

No material ambiguity
Minor clarification
Important missing evidence
Conflicting or highly suspicious evidence

Try changing the scenario

Add a client meeting description and signed approval.

Catalog source: TypeSafeAI/typesafe-playground, reused under MIT. This is an independent community catalog, not an official TypeSafe AI product.

Background source: Inspired by TypeSafe workflow evals; examples authored for this playground

Browse all examples Load first question