Workflows & decisionschoicenoulscore
State
This is the context Jev receives before answering the typed question.
{
"draft": "We operationalize composable decisioning synergies across the intelligence plane.",
"sources": [],
"audience": "Small business owners",
"goal": "Explain what the product does"
}Typed questions (3)
Editorial next step
choiceChoose the strongest supported next editorial step.
Try in Playground- publish | Clear and supported enough for the stated context
- fact_check | Factual claim needs support or contradicts supplied evidence
- rewrite | Meaning or audience fit needs work
- clarify | Purpose or source material is missing
Claims supported
noulAre the checkable claims in the draft supported by the supplied sources? If no checkable claims exist, answer yes.
Try in PlaygroundClarity
scoreRate how clearly the intended audience can understand the main point.
Try in Playground- Hard to understand
- Main point needs work
- Mostly clear
- Clear and specific
Try changing the scenario
Rewrite it as one concrete input and output.